Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan
ISSN: 1022-386X (PRINT)
ISSN: 1681-7168 (ONLINE)
Affiliations
doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2026.03.429
Sir,
Paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) have grown exponentially since the COVID pandemic era, contributing to a notable decrease in mortality rate globally. In developed countries, PICU mortality ranges from 1.85–5.8%, compared with 6.7–51.1% in low-income countries.1 Pakistan continues to face a substantial burden of acute, yet potentially reversible, illnesses; however, there is a lack of resources and a scarcity of qualified intensivists and nursing staff.2 We conducted a pooled analysis of 13 studies on the epidemiological profile of paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Pakistan from 2009 to 2024 to provide a snapshot of demographic, clinical, and outcome data from both private and public sector PICUs across the country.3,4
A total of 5,756 critically ill children were included in these studies. Their ages ranged from 8 months to 6.72 years, and nearly 50% of them were younger than 12 months. More than 50% were male. Respiratory (10–44%), neurological (10–35%), and cardiac (7–42%) conditions were the leading causes of admission. Sepsis accounted for up to 30.7% of cases in some studies. The length of stay (LOS) in PICUs ranged from 1 to 10.5 days (Table I).
Mortality rates varied widely (12.9–37.4%), reflecting disparities in resource allocation and care protocols. A high mortality rate was observed in ventilated patients with septic shock, calling for targeted interventions, including improved infection control and ventilation strategies. This pooled analysis underscores the urgent need for a structured system and collaborative efforts to reduce PICU mortality in Pakistan and helps in achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2030 (SDG) 3.2.1.
It is recommended to establish a unified database to track admissions, interventions, and outcomes across PICUs; to develop evidence-based guidelines for sepsis management and mechanical ventilation; to prioritise training and equipment allocation, particularly in small cities with a high disease burden; and to implement the System, Space, Staff, and Stuff (4S) framework for establishing PICUs.5
We urge policymakers and clinicians to leverage these findings for targeted improvements in paediatric critical care.
Table I: Discriptive characterstics of PICUs studies from Pakistan.
|
Variables |
Study 1 |
Study 2 |
Study 3 |
Study 4 |
Study 5 |
Study 6 |
Study 7 |
Study 8 |
Study 9 |
Study 10 |
Study 11 |
Study 12 |
Study 13 |
|
Title |
Improving outcomes in PICU in the Academic Hospital in Pakistan |
Clinical profile and outcome in a PICU in Pakistan |
The profile and outcomes of children admitted to the PICU of a public hospital in Karachi |
Clinical spectrum and outcomes of patients admitted to the PICU of a tertiary hospital |
Evaluating outcomes in mechanically ventilated young patients in a PICU |
Clinical profile and outcome in a PICU in Pakistan |
Clinical profile and outcome of the patients admitted to PICU in tertiary hospital. |
Mortality patterns among critically ill children in the PICU of a developing country |
Clinical profile and outcome in the PICU of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan |
Survival among patients admitted to the PICU of a tertiary childcare hospital. |
Disease spectrum and outcome of patients in the PICU of the Federal Govt. Polyclinic Hospital (FGPC) Islamabad |
Accuracy of pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) |
Outcome among mechanically ventilated children in a tertiary care hospital. |
|
Publication year |
2009 |
2009 |
2016 |
2024 |
2023 |
2015 |
2021 |
2015 |
2020 |
2021 |
2024 |
2020 |
2022 |
|
Centre |
AKUH |
AKUH |
Civil Hospital Karachi |
Children’s Hospital Lahore |
Shahida Islam Hospital, Lodhran |
Children’s Hospital, Multan |
Nishtar Hospital, Multan |
AKUH |
Military Hospital, Rawalpindi |
Children’s Hospital, Multan |
Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad |
Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi |
National Institute of Child Health, Karachi |
|
Year of study |
2005-2007 |
2007 |
2013-2014 |
2023 |
2022-2023 |
2011-2014 |
2018 |
2006-2012 |
2017-2018 |
2019-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2017-2019 |
2019 |
|
Duration (months) |
24 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
6 |
42 |
12 |
72 |
6 |
7 |
24 |
19 |
12 |
|
No of admissions |
413 |
314 |
243 |
884 |
154 |
1573 |
150 |
248 |
531 |
205 |
424 |
407 |
210 |
|
Age in months |
1-168 |
1-168 |
1-120 |
1 - 60 |
1- 120 |
1-168 |
1-144 |
4-96 |
1-156 |
1-144 |
1-144 |
1-144 |
1-168 |
|
Male Female |
63% |
66% |
52% |
59% |
65% |
63% |
55% |
60.5% |
58% |
60.5% |
56.4% |
54.5% |
55.7% |
|
37% |
34% |
48% |
41% |
35% |
37% |
45% |
39.5% |
42% |
39.5% |
33.6% |
45.5% |
44.3% |
|
|
Respiratory cardiac neurologic sepsis others |
10% |
10% |
28% |
22.3% |
35.1% |
18% |
26.7% |
13.3% |
39.90% |
N/A |
37.3% |
44% |
N/A |
|
42% |
42% |
9% |
0% |
14.9% |
7% |
6.7% |
13.3% |
12.1% |
N/A |
2.4% |
- |
N/A |
|
|
10% |
10% |
18% |
22.5% |
29.2% |
23.5% |
12% |
14.9% |
17.5% |
N/A |
15.5% |
35.5% |
N/A |
|
|
7% |
0% |
14.4% |
2.9% |
9.1% |
- |
30.7% |
17.3% |
0% |
N/A |
14.6% |
14.9% |
N/A |
|
|
31% |
38% |
30% |
52% |
- |
11% |
25% |
38% |
30.5% |
N/A |
13.9% |
5.6% |
N/A |
|
|
Mechanical ventilation |
90% |
90% |
34% |
54% |
100% |
27.8% |
41% |
100% |
23% |
N/A |
27.4% |
35.2% |
100% |
|
LOS (days) |
5.3 |
3.2 |
1 |
10.5 |
7.08 |
4.5 |
N/A |
N/A |
4.11 |
4.52 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
6.73 |
|
Mortality |
24.5% |
14% |
24.4% |
14% |
33.8% |
19% |
18% |
12.% |
26.6% |
15% |
25% |
37.4% |
37% |
COMPETING INTEREST:
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION:
UF: Study design, data analysis, and wrote the manuscript.
AH: Concept, critical review, and final guarantor of the manuscript
AS: Data collection.
All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
REFERENCES