5-Year Impact Factor: 0.9
Volume 35, 12 Issues, 2025
  Original Article     January 2024  

Effects of Haemodynamic Changes Caused by Different Pneumoperitoneum Pressures on Cerebral Oxygenation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

By Kivanc Oncu1, Sedat Saylan2

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sinop Ataturk State Hospital, Sinop, Turkiye
  2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye
doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.01.16

ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the role of different pneumoperitoneum pressure ranges on cerebral oxygenation.
Study Design: Prospective, randomised controlled trial.
Place and Duration of the Study: Karadeniz Technical University, Turkiye, from January to September 2020.
Methodology: Seventy patients (aged 18-65 years, ASA I-IIII) scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups; low pressure (LP, 10-12 mmHg) and high pressure (HP, 13-15 mmHg). The heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, BIS, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and left and right regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) were recorded during induction, at the beginning, and after 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 90th minutes of pneumoperitoneum, after the surgical and anaesthesia procedures.
Results: The findings did not demonstrate a significant difference between the haemodynamic parameters of the groups. However, there were differences (fifth [p=0.022], fifteenth minutes [p=0.035], at the end [p=0038] of pneumoperitoneum in right rSO2, and similarly at the end [p=0.038] of pneumoperitoneum in left rSO2 between mean variation of rSO2 when compared to the baseline; cerebral oxygenation was better preserved in LP. While no patient had more than 20% rSO2 reduction in LP, a total of three patients had cerebral desaturation in HP.
Conclusion: Although <15 mmHg pressure for pneumoperitoneum was usually well-tolerated by patients, it had been observed that cerebral oxygenation may be affected with this range. The pathophysiological effects of pneumoperitoneum and possible consequences of this situation should be considered while performing laparoscopy.

Key Words: Cerebrovascular circulation, Haemodynamics, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Near- infrared spectroscopy, Pneumoperitoneum.

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed with pneumoperitoneum which is a result of iatrogenic insufflation of an inert gas (usually carbon dioxide) into the abdomen. The pathophysiological results of increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and hypercapnia on cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, endocrine and neurological systems had been the subject of many studies.

It is emphasised that intraoperative cardiac and respiratory deteriorations occur during pneumoperitoneum (especially at the initial stage) in laparoscopic procedures.1,2

Although IAP below 15 mmHg for pneumoperitoneum are considered to be relatively 'safe', it is possible to encounter significant haemodynamic fluctuations and pathophysiological results even in laparoscopic procedures performed in this range.2,3

The near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) can measure oxygenation in the prefrontal cortex and detect increases in oxygen extraction caused by reduced oxygen delivery within a very short reaction time.4 It is known that intraoperative cerebral oxygenation monitoring with the NIRS can be used in patient groups (especially elderly, and children) for the assessment and follow-up of postoperative neurological outcomes.5-7

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and cerebral oxygenation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy at IAP ranges classified as low (10-12 mmHg) and high (13-15 mmHg) using NIRS technique. Other objectives were investigating the correlations between haemodynamic variables and NIRS values, and analysing the differences in haemodynamic variables between groups.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective, randomised trial was conducted at the University Hospital after obtaining the approval from the ethics committee (Karadeniz Technical University Scientific Research Ethics Committee, 2020/11). Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Patient Rights Regulation between January and September 2020. In addition, the study was registered at the publicly accessible trial registry of the United States National Library (www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT: 04309318).

Patients with ASA I-III, 18-65 years of age and undergoing general anaesthesia for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were eligible. The exclusion criteria included cerebrovascular pathology, uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, anaemia, coagulopathy, cirrhosis, peritonitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and related respiratory diseases, morbidly obese (BMI >35 kg/m2) patients and emergency operations.

The preoperative fasting period of the cases was planned to be eight hours. Premedications, 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 0.01 mg/kg atropine sulfate, were administered intramuscularly. Peripheral venous access was established with a 20 Gauge cannula, and then 0.9% saline (4 mg/kg/h) infusion was initiated to the patients who were taken to the operating room.

The patients included in the study were taken to the operating table and electrocardiography, heart rate, non-invasive arterial pressure (NIBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) bispectral index (BIS), and NIRS (Cerebral/Somatic Oximeter) monitoring was applied.

Basal measurements of the patients (in a relaxed, calm position, and without oxygen support ) were recorded in the patient follow-up form and, afterwards, preoxygenation was administered with 100% oxygen for three minutes. Anaesthesia induction was performed with 1 µg/kg fentanyl, 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 2-3 mg/kg propofol, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Endotracheal intubation was accomplished after sufficient time had passed for the muscle relaxation, and the BIS value was monitored in the range of 40-60. Following endotracheal intubation, tidal volume was adjusted between 6-8 ml/kg (based on the ideal weight) and respiratory rate between 10-12/min, to keep the EtCO₂ within the limits of 32-40 mmHg. In the maintenance of anaesthesia, sevoflurane at 2% was used in a mixture of 50% air-50% oxygen, and an additional 0.1 mg/kg rocuronium was administered for the maintenance of muscle relaxation if required. Remifentanil infusion (0.5-2 µg/kg/min) was administered as an analgaesic during the operation. The required depth of anaesthesia was adjusted so that the BIS value was between 40-60, and additional hypnotic and analgaesic drugs were added when needed. In case of rSO2 decreased by more than 20%, after necessary checks, 100% oxygen was administered and the cerebral oxygenation were brought into the safe range.

The patients were divided into two groups by computer-assisted randomisation method: Group Low Pressure received LP (n=35) and Group High Pressure received HP pneumoperitoneum (n=35). The patients and anaesthesiologists were blinded to the group assignments. The CONSORT flow diagram is shown in Figure 1. The surgical team was informed before the operation according to the randomisation, and appropriate pneumoperitoneum was applied by the same team.

The pneumoperitoneum was initiated at an insufflation rate of 40 lt/min. Patients were placed in the reverse Trendelenburg position (20-30o, without side) on the operating table. Heart rate, SPO2, NIBP, BIS, EtCO2, and rSO2 (right and left frontal region) were measured of all patients before induction (baseline), after induction, at the beginning of pneumoperitoneum, 5,10, 15, 30, 60, 90 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, at termination of pneumoperitoneum, end of surgical procedure and end of anaesthesia procedure (before the patient was sent to the recovery unit).

Power analysis was performed for two groups in the sample size of the study based on the primary objective. Accordingly, in the t-test study of independent samples, when the significance level of the differences was 6 and the type 1 error was 0.05, the sample size was calculated as 28 (twenty-eight) for each group with 80% power. Sampling was computed with OpenEpi (Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version 3).

Data were analysed with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 23, IBM, United States of America). The conformity to the normal distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables according to the groups. Independent samples t-test was used to compare the normally distributed data according to the groups and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the non-normally distributed data. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the normally distributed data according to time within the groups, and the Friedman test was used to compare the data that was not normally distributed. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between normally distributed quantitative data. The analysis results were presented as mean±standard deviation and median (minimum – maximum) for the quantitative data and as frequency (percent) for the categorical data. While the mean value was based on the independent two-sample t-test and repeated analysis of variance, the median values were based on the Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests. The level of significance was considered as <0.05.

RESULTS

There were seventy patients, in two equal groups, included in the study. Two patients from the low pressure group and six patients from the high pressure group were excluded from the study after switching to laparotomy for surgical reasons.

Table I: Patient characteristics and procedural variables of groups.

 

Low Pressure (n = 31)

High Pressure (n = 29)

p-value

Age (years) **

49.45 ±12.58

47.32±12.83

0.514

Gender* (Female/Male)

22/9

19/10

0.650

Height (m)***

1.67  ± 0.10

1.68  ± 0.06

0.653

Weight (kg)***

78.23  ± 13.20

79.86  ± 6.60

0.543

Body Mass Index (kg/m2)***

27.8± 3.55

28.3± 2.61

0.634

ASA score (n) 1/2/3

3/24/4

3/26/0

0.134*

Anaesthesia time (min)**

78.90 ± 21.64

73.14 ± 16.33

0.386

Surgery time (min)**

58.03 ± 19.37

55.24 ± 17.09

0.739

Insufflation time (min)**

46.87  ± 17.81

42.66 ± 16.36

0.378

*Chi-square test,  **Mann Whitney U test,  *** Student t-test (mean ±SD).


Table II. Cerebral oxygen saturation variation at different measurement times according to the baseline.

Measurement

period 

Low Pressure

High Pressure

Test Statistic

p-value

 

Avg. ± SD

Avg. (min - max)

Avg. ± SD

Avg. (min - max)

 

Right rSO₂ (Induction)

-3.4 ± 5.9

-4.0 (-17.0 – 13.0)

-5.0 ± 7.3

-6.0 (-18.0 – 12.0)

t=0.927

0.358

 

Right rSO₂ (Pneu.)

-4.0 ± 7.0

-1.0 (-19.0 – 5.0)

-2.0 ± 7.0

-3.0 (-14.0 – 15.0)

t=-1.127

0.264

 

Right rSO₂ (Pneu. 5min)

-3.3 ± 6.5

-3.0 (-17.0 – 8.0)

2.0 ± 10.0

2.0 (-1.0 – 33.0)

t=-2.455

0.017

 

Right rSO₂ (Pneu. 10min)

-4.6 ± 7.8

-3.0 (-22.0 – 7.0)

0.0 ± 9.7

-1.0 (-17.0 – 19.0)

t=-2.004

0.050

 

Right rSO₂ (Pneu. 15min)

-5.3 ± 7.9

-3.0 (-25.0 – 5.0)

0.0 ± 9.5

0.0 (-16.0 – 19.0)

t=-2.351

0.022

 

Right rSO₂ (Pneu. 30min)

-4.6 ± 5.9

-4.0 (-18.0 – 3.0)

-1.4 ± 9.3

-4,0 (-16,0 - 23,0)

t=-1.835

0.162

 

Right rSO₂ (Pneu. 60min)

-3.3 ± 3.0

-5.0 (-6.0 – 2.0)

4.8 ± 11.3

2.0 (-6.0 – 24.0)

t=-1.835

0.096

 

Right rSO₂ (Pneu. end)

-7.1 ± 7.7

-6.0 (-25.0 – 4.0)

-2.4 ± 9.1

-2.0 (-23.0 – 20.0)

t=-2.157

0.035

 

Right rSO₂ (Surgery end)

-7.7 ± 7.9

-6.0 (-27.0 – 4.0)

-3.5 ± 10.7

-5.0 (-18.0 – 25.0)

t=-1.754

0.085

 

Right rSO₂ (Anaes.end)

-10.7± 6.8

-11.0 (-31.0 – 1.0)

-7.6 ± 9.3

-7.0 (-22.0 – 13.0)

t=-1.51

0.136

 

Left rSO₂ (Induction)

-3.4 ± 5.2

-3.0 (-13.0 – 6.0)

-5.8 ± 7.5

-5.0 (-24.0 – 8.0)

t=-1.413

0.156

 

Left rSO₂ (Pneu.)

-3.9 ± 6.9

-3.0 (-22.0 – 7.0)

-0.8 ± 10.0

-2.0 (-18.0 – 28.0)

t=-1.413

0.163

 

Left rSO₂ (Pneu. 5min)

-3.0 ± 8.6

-2.0 (-24.0 – 15.0)

1.0 ± 10.0

0.0 (-19.0 – 20.0)

t=-1.673

0.100

 

Left rSO₂ (Pneu. 10min)

-3,1 ± 8,5

-2.0 (-25.0 – 17.0)

-0.6 ± 9.8

1,0 (-21,0 – 14,0)

t=-1.061

0.293

 

Left rSO₂ (Pneu. 15min)

-4.9 ± 8.0

-4.0 (-25.0 – 8.0)

-1.0 ± 10.0

-1.0 (-22.0 – 15.0)

t=-1,698

0.095

 

Left rSO₂ (Pneu. 30min)

-5.2 ± 7.1

-4.0 (-24.0 – 4.0)

-1,7 ± 10,5

1.0 (-23.0 – 17.0)

t=-2.757

0.174

 

Left rSO₂ (Pneu. 60min)

-6.6 ± 4.4

-5.0 (-13.0 - -2.0)

4.6 ± 9.6

2.0 (-5.0 – 17.0)

t=-2.119

0.057

 

Left rSO₂ (Pneu. end)

-7.0 ± 7.1

-5.0 (-24.0 – 4.0)

-2.6 ± 9.1

-4.0 (-20.0 – 18.0)

t=-2.119

0.038

 

Left rSO₂ (Surgery end)

-6.5 ± 7.1

-6.0 (-24.0 – 6.0)

-3.9 ± 9.7

-4.0 (-22.0 – 21.0)

t=-1.182

0.242

 

Left rSO₂ (Anaes. end)

-10.4± 7.7

-10.0 (-24.0 – 6.0)

-8.2 ± 10.1

-8.0 (-26.0 – 16.0)

t=-0.946

0.348

 

t: Two sample independent t-test; Pneu: Pneumoperitoneum; Anaes: Anaesthesia.


Table III. Correlations between rSO2 and haemodynamic parameters in the high pressure group.

Haemodynamic

Parameter

 

Right rSO2

Left rSO2

P

5min

10min

15min

P

5min

10min

15min

Heart rate

r

-0.323

-0.234

-0.044

-0.112

-0.524

-0.307

0.061

-0.106

p

0.088

0.221

0.822

0.563

0.003

0.105

0.755

0.585

Systolic arterial pressure

r

-0.108

-0.031

0.252

0.301

-0.047

-0.009

0.151

-0.066

p

0.577

0.873

0.187

0.113

0.811

0.963

0.434

0.734

Diastolic arterial pressure

r

-0.011

0.147

0.340

0.224

0.005

0.103

0.365

0.045

p

0.957

0.448

0.071

0.242

0.981

0.594

0.051

0.817

Mean arterial pressure

r

-0.110

0.110

0.314

0.245

-0.056

0.110

0.288

-0.025

p

0.570

0.569

0.098

0.201

0.775

0.570

0.130

0.896

Peripheral saturation

r

-0.139

-0.299

-0.183

-0.209

-0.192

-0.358

-0.318

-0.242

p

0.471

0.115

0.343

0.276

0.319

0.057

0.092

0.205

EtCO₂

r

-0.201

-0.354

-0.312

-0.157

-0.280

-0.532

-0.521

-0.502

p

0.296

0.060

0.100

0.416

0.141

0.003

0.004

0.005

BIS

r

0.129

0.045

-0.206

-0.047

0.188

-0.074

-0.203

0.184

p

0.506

0.818

0.284

0.809

0.328

0.701

0.290

0.341

r: Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (P: onset of pneumoperitoneum).

Figure 1: CONSORT diagram of patient recruitment.

Figure 2: Distribution of the NIRS scores during the operation in the two groups.
T0: Baseline, T1: Induction, T2: Onset of pneu., T3: 5th min, T4: 10th min, T5: 15th min, T6: 30th min, T7: 60th min, T8: end of pneu., T9: End of surgery, T10: End of anaesthesia, pneu: Pneumoperitoneum.

Due to the requirement for pressure increase during surgery, two patients from the low pressure group were excluded. As a result, total of sixty patients data were analysed (Figure 1).

There were no statistical difference between the low-pressure and high-pressure groups in terms of age, gender, height, body weight, mean body mass index, ASA classification, and procedural variables (total anaesthesia time, total surgery time, and pneumoperitoneum insufflation time) (Table I).

When the mean variations of the right rSO2 and left rSO2 at different times according to the groups (Figure 2) were compared with the baseline (Table II), a statistically significant difference was found between the right rSO2 values at the fifth minute after pneumoperitoneum as compared to the baseline (p=0.017). The mean of the low pressure group was -3.3 (3.3 units increase as compared to the baseline ), while the mean for the high pressure group was 2.0 (2 units decrease as compared to the baseline).

There was a statistically significant difference between the mean variations of the right rSO2 values at the 15th minute after pneumoperitoneum according to the groups compared to the baseline (p=0.022). While the mean of the low pressure group was -5.3, it did not change in the high pressure group.

Regarding the assessment of the mean variables of the left rSO2 values, consistent with other results, there was a difference between end of the pneumoperitoneum and the baseline (p=0.038). The mean of the low pressure group was -7.0, while the mean of the high pressure group was -2.6, correspondingly.

In the high pressure group, there was a moderate negative correlation between variation of EtCO₂ and variation of left rSO2 at the 5th (p=0.003), 10th (p=0.004), and 15th (p=0.005) minutes of pneumoperitoneum (Table III). Furthermore, there was a moderate negative correlation between variation of heart rate and variation of left rSO2 at the beginning of pneumoperitoneum (p=0.003). Besides, no correlation was measured between other haemodynamic variables in this group.

DISCUSSION

Considering the main findings of the study, when the mean of rSO2 variations obtained at all measurement times was compared to the baseline (Table II), there were significant differences in right rSO2 at the fifth, fifteenth minutes and at the end of the pneumoperitoneum. No significant haemodynamic depression was observed in either group. Hence, it was concluded that cerebral oxygenation was better pre-served in the LP than in the HP.

Since the early 1970s, when the laparoscopy technique was in the mainstream, many animal and human studies based on the outcome of laparoscopy had been published. Although higher IAP (>20 mmHg) was used previously, pneumoperitoneum had been performed using usually lower IAP (<15 mmHg) in modern anaesthesia and surgical techniques since the 1990s. It was observed that the knowledge of the literature also developed in this direction.1

Umar et al., in their study, classified the pneumoperitoneum pressures of 8–10 mm Hg, 11–13 mm Hg, 14 mm Hg in ASA I-II, aged 18-60 years patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and compared the intraoperative haemodynamic variations observed during the operation in these three groups.8 They showed that there were significant differences among the groups in terms of heart rate, blood pressure, and EtCO2. However, in the present study, no significant difference was found between the groups accord-ing to the haemodynamic variations.

Inal et al. classified the pneumoperitoneum pressure of 10 mm Hg and 14 mm Hg in one hundred of ASA I-III patients who underwent laparascopic cholecystectomy. As a conclusion, there were no haemodynamic variables between the two groups.9 Nevertheless, the rSOvalue changed over time with a statistically significant group difference. Overall, a high-pressure pneumoperitoneum was associated with a greater decrease in rSO2 as compared to a low-pressure, in their results. Considering the absence of difference in haemodynamic variables between the two groups and the cerebral saturation decrease in the high pressure group, it was obser-ved that the aforementioned study reported similar results as the current study. Therefore, they suggested use of a low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in patients with central nervous system pathologies.

Zuckerman et al. observed significant haemodynamic (cardiac index and stroke volume) depression, especially in the first ten minutes of pneumoperitoneum, in thirty-eight patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with 15 mmHg IAP. 10 Again in this study, it was emphasised that the haemodynamic depression was compensated substantially after the tenth to fifteenth minutes of the pneumoperitoneum. As mentioned earlier, in the high pressure group in the current study, although haemodynamic depression was not observed, there was a significant deterioration in cerebral saturation in the first 15 minutes following the initiation of pneumoperitoneum.

There were also studies in the literature that concluded that low pneumoperitoneum pressures do not have advantage on haemodynamic variables and cerebral oxygenation.11-13 Kaya et al. evaluated cerebral oxygen levels in sixty-two patients (aged 18-65 years; ASA I-III), who were equally divided into a low-pressure (8 mmHg) and standard-pressure (14 mmHg) groups, and scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy.11 Both groups had similar rSO2, arterial blood gas, haemoglobin values at all measurement times, and equal number (four) of cerebral desaturation events. As a result, they deduced that low insufflation pressure offered no advantages over standard pressure in terms of haemodynamics, arterial blood gases, cerebral oxygen saturation during the laparoscopic nephrectomy. In contrast to the present study, Kaya et al. observed significant advantages (Table II, Figure 2) in the preservation of cerebral oxygenation in the low pressure group, especially at the onset of pneumoperitoneum.

Decreased cerebral oxygenation may cause neurocognitive disorders and/or cerebrovascular events that may occur even at an early stage after anaesthesia.2 Some patient populations were susceptible to these adverse changes in cerebral oxygenation, particularly the elderly, obese, and patients with impaired cardiovascular function.5,14,15

Gipson et al. evaluated the cerebral oxygenation of seventy patients in the ASA II and III groups who underwent elective laparoscopic surgery under 8-12 mmHg IAP, using the NIRS at 5-minute intervals.16 After the pneumoperitoneum was initiated in the 12 patients included in the aforementioned study, it was shown that there was a 20% decrease in rSO2 as compared to the baseline, and a 25% decrease in rSO2 values when compared to the baseline in 6 patients. Correspondingly, Ruzman et al. reported a significant (20% or more from the baseline) decrease in rSO2 during peritoneal insufflation in one-fifth of 65 patients in ASA I and II risk groups who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with <15 mmHg pneumoperitoneum.6

According to this study’s findings, there was no patient in the LP who had a decrease of more than 20% as compared to the baseline during the operation period when the right rSO2 were compared with the baseline. Notwithstanding, a decrease of more than 20% in rSO2 was observed in three patients in the HP.

Correlation analysis related to possible haemodynamic variations that may cause a decrease in rSO2, especially in the HP, were applied by the current results. Strong negative correlations were detected between rSO2 and EtCO2 in the onset of pneumoperitoneum and in the first fifteen minutes in both groups (Table III). This result was interpreted as a serious relationship between hypercapnia and impaired cerebral oxygenation.

There were some limitations in this study. First, echocardiography measurements, which can evaluate the cardiovascular system in more detail and technically, could not be performed in the examination of haemodynamic changes.17 Secondly, while the effects of carbon dioxide peritoneum were evaluated with EtCO2 in the examination of haemodynamic changes, it may be necessary to use PaCO2 analysis in blood gas for further interpretation. Third, the possible effects of changes in cerebral oxygenation on cognitive functions in the pre- and postoperative period of the patients could not be evaluated with a scale such as the Mini Mental State Examination test.5 Finally, direct or indirect intracranial pressure measurement could not be performed to evaluate the correlation between increased IAP and increased intracranial pressure due to technical and ethical difficulties.

CONCLUSION

Cerebral oxygenation was significantly preserved in patients operated under IAP of 10-12 mmHg, compared to 13-15 mmHg. These results are important, especially in laparoscopic surgeries performed in patients with comorbid diseases and impaired compensation mechanisms, as they may set a precedent for future studies to review surgical and anaesthesia management.

ETHICAL APPROVAL:
The study was approved by the University Scientific Research Ethics Committee, submission number: 2020/11, dated 24.01. 2020.

PATIENTS’ CONSENT:
Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Patient Righ-ts Regulation.

COMPETING INTEREST:
The authors declared that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest related to this paper.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION:
KO, SS: Substantial contributions to the conception, and design of the work, acquisition, analysis interpretation of data, drafting the work or revising it critically, and final approval of the version to be published.

Both authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

REFERENCES

  1. Joris JL. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In: RD Miller, Fleisher LA, Jones RA, Savarese JJ, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, Eds. Miller's Anesthesia. ed. 6th, Philadelphia; Churchill Livingstone; 2005: p. 2289.
  2. Atkinson TM, Giraud GD, Togioka BM, Jones DB, Cigarroa JE. Cardiovascular and ventilatory consequences of laparoscopic surgery. Circulation 2017; 135(7):700-10. doi:10. 1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023262.
  3. Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44(7):834-41. doi:10.1034/j. 1399-6576.2000.440709.x.
  4. Seubert CN, Mahla ME. Neurologic monitoring. In: RD Miller, Fleisher LA, Jones RA, Savarese JJ,  Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL., Eds. Miller's Anesthesia. ed.8th, Philadelphia; Churchill Livingstone; 2014.
  5. Casati A, Fanelli G, Pietropaoli P, Proietti R, Tufano R, Montanini S, et al. Monitoring cerebral oxygen saturation in elderly patients undergoing general abdominal surgery: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24(1):59-65. doi:10.1017/S0265021506001025.

     
  6. Ruzman T, Mraovic B, Simurina T, Gulam D, Ruzman N, Miskulin M. Transcranial cerebral oxymetric monitoring reduces brain hypoxia in obese and elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017; 27(4): 248-52. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000444.
  7. Pelizzo G, Bernardi L, Carlini V, Pasqua N, Mencherini S, Maggio G, et al. Laparoscopy in children and its impact on brain oxygenation during routine inguinal hernia repair. J Minim Access Surg 2017; 13(1):51-56. doi:10.4103/0972- 9941.181800.
  8. Umar A, Mehta KS, Mehta N. Evaluation of hemodynamic changes using different intra-abdominal pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg 2013; 75(4): 284-9. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0484-x.
  9. Inal MT, Memis D, Sezer A, Turan N. The effects of different insufflation pressures on cerebral oxygen saturation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg 2020; 82(3):377-81. doi:10.1007/s12262-019-01973-6.
  10. Zuckerman RS, Heneghan S. The duration of hemodynamic depression during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(8):1233-1236. doi:10.1007/s00464-001- 9152-0.
  11. Kaya C, Ustun YB, Bilgin S, Koksal E, Ozden E, Dost B. Cerebral oximetry after low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2022; 32(3):346-51. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2022.03.346.
  12. Karaveli A, Kavaklı AS, Ozcelik M, Ates M, Inanoglu K, Ozmen S. The effect of different levels of pneumoperitoneum pressures on regional cerebral oxygenation during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Turk J Med Sci 2021; 51(3):1136-45. doi:10.3906/sag-2005-368.
  13. Cho YJ, Paik H, Jeong SY, Park JW, Jo WY, Jeon Y, et al. Lower intra-abdominal pressure has no cardiopulmonary benefits during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2018; 32(11): 4533-42. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6204-2.
  14. Cavuoto LA, Maikala RV. Role of obesity on cerebral hemodynamics and cardiorespiratory responses in healthy men during repetitive incremental lifting. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115(9):1905-17. doi:10.1007/s00421-015-3171-3.
  15. Fan Y, Liu X, Wu S, Liu Y. The risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery: A retrospective analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100(2): e23977. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000023977.
  16. Gipson CL, Johnson GA, Fisher R, Stewart A, Giles G, Johnson JOet al. Changes in cerebral oximetry during peritoneal insufflation for laparoscopic procedures. J Minim Access Surg 2006; 2(2):67-72. doi:10.4103/0972-9941.26651.
  17. Ramos LPJ, Araújo RB, Castro MDCV, Ramos MRMS, Cunha-E-Silva JA, Iglesias AC. Hemodynamic evaluation of elderly patients during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Rev Col Bras Cir 2018; 45(2):e1659. doi:10.1590/0100-6991e-20181659.