Impact Factor 1.0
Volume 34, 12 Issues, 2024
  Original Article     June 2024  

Effects of Ziziphus Honey on Bone Healing of the Extracted Tooth Socket by Evaluating Osteopontin Levels

By Momina Khalid1, Sehrish Zaffar2, Fatima Ikram1, Waqar Ahmed Siddiqui2, Mobin Riaz3, Anam Shaukat3

Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral Biology, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
  2. Department of Pharmacology, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
  3. Department of Prosthodontics, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.06.693

ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the effect of Ziziphus honey on the healing of post-extraction alveolar sockets by estimating the levels of osteopontin (OPN) in humans.
Study Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Place and Duration of the Study: Dental section of the Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March 2020 to February 2021.
Methodology: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 35 ± 0.28 years. The participants were adults undergoing permanent molar extraction, randomly divided into two groups, a control group and an experimental group. After tooth extractions in both groups, 1ml of Ziziphus honey was administered into the extracted tooth socket of the experimental group while no intervention was done to the control group. Saliva samples were collected on day 0 before tooth extraction and on days 3 and 7 after tooth extractions. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique was used to measure the levels of OPN in the saliva sample. Radiographic evaluation was also done with the help of periapical radiographs using Image J® software. To find out the significance of the outcome in experimental and control groups, an unpaired t-test was applied. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 30 participants were selected for the study, of which 16 were females and 14 were males. The OPN levels between the control vs. experimental groups were (22.55 ± 2.45 vs. 23.31 ± 2.38; p = 0.4) on day 0, (30.95 ± 2.96 vs. 53.29 ± 4.69; p = 0.001) on day 3, and (55.33 ± 4.52 vs. 81.90 ± 4.49; p = 0.001) on day 7.
Conclusion: Increased salivary levels of the OPN in the experimental group with the use of Ziziphus honey suggests better bone healing as compared to the control group.

Key Words: Extraction tooth, Honey, Osteopontin, Ziziphus, Bone healing.

INTRODUCTION

Ziziphus honey is a type of honey which has the greatest amount of minerals and energy, among more than a hundred types of honey. It is obtained from a tree named Ziziphus Spina-Christi, also known as Sedr tree as its Persian name.1 Ziziphus belongs to the Rhamnaceae family of the plants. Dark-coloured honey has greater mineral content and polyphenol content as compared to light-coloured honey.2 Antibacterial potential of honey is attributed to three mechanisms, the presence of hydrogen peroxide, acidic pH, and hygroscopic nature. Hydro-gen peroxide is identified as a major antibacterial substance in honey, produced by an enzyme glucose oxidase which is already present in honey.3

 Owing to this property, studies have documented a reduction in the severity of oral mucositis with the use of Ziziphus honey in patients undergoing radiotherapy.4 Ziziphus honey has also demonstrated antimicrobial activity against gram-negative as well as gram-positive bacteria.5

Osteopontin (OPN) is a non-collagenous bone matrix protein, present in bone and teeth, which is highly phosphorylated and rich in sialic acid. In humans, OPN is present in numerous biological fluids such as serum, plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and saliva.6 OPN has the sites of serine/threonine phosphorylation that facilitate hydroxyapatite binding and a highly sustained Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) motif that facilitates cell attachment and signalling.7 OPN is always expressed in the process of osteogenesis, bone remodelling, and cell-mediated immune response. Along with several non-collagenous proteins, it controls the ordered deposition of minerals into the bone by modifying the quantity and dimensions of hydroxyapatite crystals. During bone mineralisation, OPN impedes the formation of hydroxyapatite crystals.8

OPN plays an essential role in osteogenesis, after bone drilling, it is an important factor for cell adhesion, signalling, and bone mineralisation during new bone formation.9 Even recombinant OPN can be used on the surface of dental implants to improve bone formation at the implant site.10 The OPN is released from one cell during osteogenesis soon after initial bone matrix formation and continues to secrete throughout the maturation of new bone with maximum levels in the initial days.11

This study was designed with the objective of assessing the bone-healing effect of Ziziphus honey on post-extraction alveolar sockets by estimating the levels of OPN in humans.

METHODOLOGY

A randomised controlled trial was carried out in the Dental section of the Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2020 to February 2021. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Post Graduate Medical Institute (PGMI), Lahore. A sample size of 30 was used as per the previous study.12 Simple random sampling technique was used by means of computer-generated numbers using Stat Trek's random number generator.

A total of 30 participants were randomly divided into two equal groups, 15 in each group, namely control and experimental groups. Participants who were included in the study, who were aged 18 years and above and advised permanent mandibular or maxillary molar extraction. Only the extraction of a single tooth was considered in an arch to standardise the area of bone healing. Participants with a history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, comorbid conditions, chronic steroid use, or a history of antibiotics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) intake within one week of tooth extraction, and pregnant and lactating females were excluded from the study. Informed consent was taken from all the participants for both the  procedure  and  for  the  publication  of  the  study  data.

Salivary sample was collected from all the participants in the control and experimental group before tooth extractions at day 0. After that, follow-up visits were conducted to collect the saliva samples on days 3 and 7 of the tooth extraction in both groups. The Spit method was used for the collection of saliva from the participants into the collection tubes according to the standard guidelines. Participants were not allowed to eat, drink, or perform oral hygiene procedures for at least one hour prior to the collection of saliva. Then, they were asked to rinse their mouth with distilled drinking water for at least one minute and spit into a 15ml sterile tube. Approximately 5ml of saliva was collected. The same guidelines were used to collect saliva on 3rd and 7th day of the study.13

The radiographic evaluation was also done measuring relative bone density (RBD) on days 3, 21, and 40 of tooth extraction. Periapical radiographs were taken and bone healing of the post-extraction sockets was compared in experimental and control groups with the help of Image J® software.

Ziziphus honey was used in this study, which was collected from the Honey Bee Research Centre at the University of Punjab, Lahore. A sample of ‘Ziziphus honey’ was verified by the Botany Department of GC University, Lahore. Honey was used in its natural, undiluted, and unprocessed form.

Local anaesthesia was given for molar extraction by infiltration technique for maxillary molars and inferior alveolar nerve block technique for mandibular molars using the injection of lidocaine HCL 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 with a maximum dose of 7 mg/kg.14 Atraumatic extractions were done in both groups.

About 1ml of Ziziphus honey was administered into empty tooth sockets using a 26-gauge sterile needle syringe after tooth extractions in the experimental group. A cotton gauze was placed over the socket to retain the honey for a longer duration. In the control group, atraumatic extractions were done without the administration of honey. All the participants were asked to hold the cotton gauze for at least 30 minutes and to avoid eating, drinking, and spitting.

All the samples were processed in the Central Research Laboratory of the Lahore General Hospital. The guidelines for the processing and storage of saliva samples were followed.13 The saliva samples were briefly vortex for approximately 20 seconds and then underwent centrifugation at the speed of 2,000 - 3,000 rpm for 20 minutes. The supernatant part without disturbing the pellet formed at the bottom of the tube. The fraction was transferred to labelled cryotubes and stored at -20 degrees centigrade.13 A commercially available ELISA kit by Immunodiagnostics® was used for the estimation of the OPN levels. Saliva samples were collected on days 3 and 7 after tooth extractions from both experimental and control groups.

Graph pad prism 8 was used for the statistical analysis of the data. Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to test the normality of the data. Descriptive statistics were applied to numerical data of the levels of OPN i.e., mean ± SE in figures and mean ± SD in tables. To find out the significance of the outcome in experimental and control groups, an unpaired t-test was applied. The p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 30 participants were selected for the study of which 16 were females and 14 were males. Mean ± SD OPN levels were 22.55 ± 2.45, 30.95 ± 2.96, and 55.33 ± 4.52 in the control group and 23.31 ± 2.38, 53.29 ± 4.69, and 81.90 ± 4.49 in the experimental group at days 0, 3, and 7, respectively. The mean difference was calculated to be 0.75, 22.35, and 26.57 in both groups as shown in Table I.

Unpaired t-test was applied between the control and experimental group on days 0, 3, and 7; p-value ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

To find out the significance of the data, an unpaired t-test was applied between both study groups on days 0, 3, and 7. The mean difference of OPN levels in both groups on day 3 and day 7 was found statistically significant as the p-value was calculated to be <0.001 as shown in Figure 1.

The results of the radiographic evaluation were inconclusive due to the incomplete patient follow-up. Therefore, statistical analysis could not be generated.

Table I: Comparison of the OPN levels (ng/ml) on different days between  the  control  and  experimental  group  (n = 30).        

Groups

OPN levels (ng/ml) Mean ± SD

Day 0

Day 3

Day 7

Control group

22.55 ± 2.45

30.95 ± 2.96

55.33 ± 4.52

Experimental group

23.31 ± 2.38

53.29 ± 4.69

81.90 ± 4.49

Mean difference

0.75

22.35

26.57

p-value

0.4003

<0.001

<0.001


Figure 1: Mean difference (mean ± SE) in levels of OPN (ng/ml) in experimental  and  control  groups  (n = 30).
 

DISCUSSION

OPN levels raised significantly in the experimental group on days 3 and 7, which shows positive relation of Ziziphus honey with bone healing at tooth extraction sites, since levels of the OPN always increase with new bone formation. Days 3 and 7 were selected for the estimation of OPN in saliva samples because, in a previous study, an increase in levels of OPN was observed at day 3 and 7, during bone formation after tooth extraction.11 The present study also confirms the rise in levels of the OPN during the first week of tooth extraction by the application of Ziziphus honey.

Many studies showed that levels of OPN significantly raised during active bone formation. In an animal study, increased expression of OPN during bone formation was observed which resulted in increased turnover and remodelling of the bone.15 In another study, analysis of OPN levels in plasma was done after scaling and root planning, and a decline in levels was observed where active bone formation was not taking place.16 Ziziphus honey has been used on alveolar sockets in an animal study where an increased number of trabeculae formation was observed in the experimental group after the tooth extrac-tions.12 These results corroborate the successful use of Ziziphus honey in tooth sockets after the extraction for better bone healing. OPN has areas of Serine/Threonine phosphorylation which aids in hydroxyapatite binding and an RGD motif which is involved in cell attachment and signalling.17 Through this mechanism, OPN functions as a bridge between cells and hydroxyapatite and helps in bone formation. OPN also has negatively charged phosphoserines which provide a strong affinity for hydroxyapatite binding.18

There are many possible mechanisms by which Ziziphus honey can promote bone healing at tooth extraction sites. Honey can induce the markers of bone as it contains hydrogen peroxide, which can control many inflammatory mediators and consequently increase osteogenic activity.19 Also, honey has immunomodulatory activity due to many components present in it which may influence the bone healing process.20 The viscosity of honey allows it to establish a protective barrier which prevents infections in the wounds and thus may contribute to better bone healing.20 Lastly, the flavonoids present in honey can increase the number of osteoprogenitor cells and inhibit osteoclastic activity, therefore, helping in bone formation.21

Ziziphus honey can be used to boost the natural bone healing process after tooth extraction, as better bone quality was observed in the experimental group. This intervention can be used in the future to enhance the quality of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants and for the fixed or removable tooth prostheses. The present study was conducted on healthy individuals only. Any further research with immunocompromised conditions, bone disease, or other debilitating diseases can be an open avenue to evaluate the effect of honey on such patients with dental extractions. Locally applied formulations can also be prepared with Ziziphus honey to increase bone healing and lower the chances of infection as well.

CONCLUSION

The local application of Ziziphus honey on extracted tooth sockets has significantly raised the levels of OPN in saliva accounting for better bone healing in the experimental group.

ETHICAL  APPROVAL:
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Post Graduate Medical Institute (PGMI), Lahore, Pakistan.

PATIENTS’  CONSENT:
Informed  consent  was  taken  from  all  the  participants.

COMPETING  INTEREST:
The  authors  declared  no  conflict  of  interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION:
MK: Conception, design, and manuscript writing.
SZ: Final approval of the manuscript to be published.
FI, WAS: Data acquisition and analysis / interpretation.
MR: Critical revision for intellectual content.
AS: Data acquisition and critical revision.
All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

REFERENCES

  1. Ekhtelat M, Ravaji K, Parvari M. Effect of Iranian Ziziphus honey on growth of some foodborne pathogens. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2016; 7(1):54-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.175069.
  2. Hegazi AG, Al Guthami FM, Ramadan MFA, Al Gethami AFM, Craig AM, Serrano S. Characterization of Sidr (Ziziphus spp.) Honey from different geographical origins. Appl Sci 2022; 12(18):9295. doi: 10.3390/app12189295.
  3. Mohammed MEA, Alargani W, Suleiman MAA, Al-Gramah HA. Hydrogen peroxide and dicarbonyl compounds concen-tration in honey samples from different botanical origins and altitudes in the South of Saudi Arabia. Curr res nutr food sci 2019; 7(1):150-60. doi:10.12944/CRNFSJ.7.1.15.
  4. Amanat A, Ahmed A, Kazmi A, Aziz B. The effect of honey on radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Indian J Palliat Care 2017; 23(3):317-20. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_146_16.
  5. Owayss AA, Elbanna K, Iqbal J, Abulreesh HH, Organji SR, Raweh HSA, et al. In vitro antimicrobial activities of Saudi honeys originating from Ziziphus spina-christi L. and Acacia gerrardii Benth. trees. Food Sci Nutr 2019; 8(1):390-401. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1320.
  6. Gebri E, Kiss A, Toth F, Hortobagyi T. Salivary osteopontin as a potential biomarker for oral mucositis. Metabolites 2021; 11(4):208. doi: 10.3390/metabo11040208.
  7. Mateos B, Holzinger J, Conrad-Billroth C, Platzer G, Zerko S, Sealey-Cardona M, et al. Hyperphosphorylation of human osteopontin and its impact on structural dynamics and molecular recognition. Biochemistry 2021; 60(17): 1347-55. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00050.
  8. Halling Linder C, Ek-Rylander B, Krumpel M, Norgard M, Narisawa S, Millan JL, et al. Bone alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase: Potential co-regulators of bone mineralization. Calcif Tissue Int 2017; 101(1): 92-101. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0259-2.
  9. McKee MD, Pedraza CE, Kaartinen MT. Osteopontin and wound healing in bone. Cells Tissues Organs 2011; 194(2-4):313-9. doi: 10.1159/000324244.
  10. Makishi S, Yamazaki T, Ohshima H. Osteopontin on the dental implant surface promotes direct osteogenesis in osseointegration. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23(3):1039. doi: 10. 3390/ijms23031039.
  11. Mendes RM, Silva GA, Lima MF, Calliari MV, Almeida AP, Alves JB, et al. Sodium hyaluronate accelerates the healing process in tooth sockets of rats. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53(12):1155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.07.001.

     
  12. Ilyas MS, Fahim A, Awan U, Athar Y, Sharjeel N, Imran A, et al. Effect of honey on healing of extracted tooth socket of albino wista rats. Int Med J 2015; 22(5):422-55.
  13. Henson BS, Wong DT. Collection, storage, and processing of saliva samples for downstream molecular applications. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 666:21-30. doi: 10.1007/978-1- 60761-820-1_2.
  14. Lee JM, Shin TJ. Use of local anesthetics for dental treatment during pregnancy; safety for parturient. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2017; 17(2):81-90. doi: 10.17245/jdapm. 2017.17.2.81.
  15. Bai RJ, Li YS, Zhang FJ. Osteopontin, a bridge links osteoarthritis and osteo-porosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1012508. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022. 1012508.
  16. Hans S, Mali AM. Estimation and comparison of osteopontin levels in plasma in subjects with healthy periodontium and generalized chronic periodontitis and its assessment after scaling and root planing. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2012; 16(3):354-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.100910.
  17. Martin-Marquez BT, Sandoval-Garcia F, Corona-Meraz FI, Martinez-Garcia EA, Sanchez-Hernandez PE, Salazar-Paramo M, et al. Osteopontin: A bone-derived protein involved in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis immunopathology. Biomolecules 2023; 13(3):502. doi: 10. 3390/biom13030502.
  18. Holzinger J, Kotisch H, Richter KW, Konrat R. Binding mode characterization of osteopontin on hydroxyapatite by solution NMR spectroscopy. Chembiochem 2021; 22(13): 2300-5. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202100139.
  19. Kamaruzzaman MA, Chin KY, Mohd Ramli ES. A review of potential beneficial effects of honey on bone health. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019; 2019:8543618. doi: 10.1155/2019/8543618.
  20. Martinotti S, Ranzato E. Honey, wound repair and regenerative medicine. J Funct Biomater 2018; 9(2):34. doi: 10.3390/jfb9020034.
  21. Mohd Ramli ES, Sukalingam K, Kamaruzzaman MA, Soelaiman IN, Pang KL, Chin KY. Direct and indirect effect of honey as a functional food against metabolic syndrome and its skeletal complications. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2021; 14:241-56. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S291828.